response from the spam poison website (copied from coops site):
Our aim is to frustrate the wanna be and the small spammers – that guy thinking in make easy money using his broadband link and a commercial e-mail extractor to later send spam or to sell CDs filled of harvested addresses. This way, spampoison’s logic was designed to complicate the life of the users of these commercial programs. It takes time to gather e-mails and to send msgs using SMTP protocol. With lots of nonexistent recipients these guys have unacceptable productivity: their work don’t pay off. Moreover, the generated addresses uses domains owned by big spammers, listed in SpamHaus.org. Them, if the collected addresses are used, the spam operation consumes
resources from both spammers.
Mission Studies 36(3), (2019); Sites 16(1), (2019); Persuasions On-Line 38(3), (2018); Australian Journal of Mission Studies 11(2), (2017); MC Journal 15(1), (2015); Pacifica 27(2), (2014); Colloquium 39(2), (2007); International Journal Study of Christian Church 6(1), (2006); Contact 142 (1) (2003); New Zealand Journal of Baptist Research 6, (2001); 2, (1998).
Sedition review;
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory review;
World's Fastest Indian review;
Serenity review;
Narnia review;
Brokeback Mountain review;
River Queen review;
Crash review
The Da Vinci Code review;
Siones Wedding review;
Praire Home Companion review;
Pirates: Dead Mans Chest review;
Three Burials review;
Inconvenient Truth review;
Over the Hedge review; Avatar, Mar 10 review.;
Invictus review;
Inception review;
Toy Story 3 review;
Girl with a Dragon Tattoo review;
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. Part 1 review;
sustain:if:able kiwi 
Email me;
)
sad to say this wouldnt work.
spammers don’t use their own servers, and they don’t give a hoot about returned email.
all it might do is slow down the internet…
good idea, probably thought of by a spammer :/
Comment by Darren — July 31, 2004 @ 12:08 am
response from the spam poison website (copied from coops site):
Our aim is to frustrate the wanna be and the small spammers – that guy thinking in make easy money using his broadband link and a commercial e-mail extractor to later send spam or to sell CDs filled of harvested addresses. This way, spampoison’s logic was designed to complicate the life of the users of these commercial programs. It takes time to gather e-mails and to send msgs using SMTP protocol. With lots of nonexistent recipients these guys have unacceptable productivity: their work don’t pay off. Moreover, the generated addresses uses domains owned by big spammers, listed in SpamHaus.org. Them, if the collected addresses are used, the spam operation consumes
resources from both spammers.
Comment by steve — August 1, 2004 @ 1:47 pm
yeah, i read that… i’m still not convinced though, spammers are either very resilient or just don’t care.
I’m with the just don’t care idea, there are so many anti spam ideas and codes out there you’d have thought that spammer’s would have given up.
i know i’d have given up if it were a commercial activity, which i doubt it actually is.
still good on em if it works.
Comment by Darren — August 1, 2004 @ 6:18 pm